09 May '11, 5pm

ExxonMobil

Rebuttal to “Analysing the ‘900 papers supporting climate scepticism’: 9 out of top 10 authors linked to ExxonMobil” When confronted with the irrefutable fact that an overwhelming number of peer-reviewed papers exist supporting skeptic arguments, desperate alarmists like Christian will always turn to whatever smear they can come up with, in this case the tired old one that the authors were “funded” by oil companies. What is falsely implied is that these scientists are corrupt and oil companies are paying them to be skeptical. This is an easy argument to prove, you simply need to show that these scientists changed their position on AGW after receiving a monetary donation from an oil company. Alarmists never show this because they cannot. These scientists all held a skeptical position prior to receiving any monetary donations. Any monetary donations these scientists received...

Full article: http://www.environmentalleader.com/2011/05/09/exxonmobil-...

Tweets

Nine Out of Ten Top Climate Deniers Linked to E...

triplepundit.com 09 May '11, 11am

Of course, the fact that these scientists’ livelihoods depend to one degree or another on a very rich oil industry with an...

20% of papers supporting climate skepticism com...

grist.org 11 May '11, 2pm

Climate change deniers like to point out that they have scientists on their side, too. But an analysis of more than 900 pa...

Most-cited climate skeptics linked to Big Oil

sustainablebusiness.com 10 May '11, 10pm

It was the trusted and saintly scientists themselves that originally polluted the planet with their pesticides and cancer ...

University Vows to Lock Out Students Opposed to ExxonMobil

University Vows to Lock Out Students Opposed to...

postcarbon.org 28 Apr '11, 8pm

There's a storm brewing on the small campus of Worcester Polytechnic Institute over the kind of vision for the future to b...