31 Aug '11, 8pm

Benefits and Costs of the Clean Air Act: $2 Trillion : $65 Billion | @EPA

In March 2011, EPA issued the Second Prospective Report which looked at the results of the Clean Air Act from 1990 to 2020. According to this study, the direct benefits from the 1990 Clean Air Act Amendments are estimated to reach almost $2 trillion for the year 2020, a figure that dwarfs the direct costs of implementation ($65 billion). The report was updated in April 2011.

Full article: http://www.epa.gov/air/sect812/prospective2.html

Tweets

Clean Air Act has cut lead air pollution by 92 percent since 1980. #4jobs #2futures #youcut #p2 #tcot

Clean Air Act has cut lead air pollution by 92 ...

ucsusa.org 31 Aug '11, 8pm

The Clean Air Act, originally passed in 1973 and amended in 1990, is a United States federal law designed to protect human...

Socking it to soot could clean air and save ice caps

Socking it to soot could clean air and save ice...

earthtimes.org 31 Aug '11, 7pm

Some call it black carbon, others BC, while most know it as soot. But whatever the name, the tiny black particles streamin...

Ameresco (AMRC): Clean Energy One-Stop Shop: Fi...

altenergystocks.com 31 Aug '11, 7pm

Contrary to common belief, the greatest barrier to the adoption of clean energy is not the cost. In many cases, cost is no...

Study: Industry Sues EPA More Often Than Enviro...

biologicaldiversity.org 31 Aug '11, 9pm

For Immediate Release, August 31, 2011 Contact: John Buse, (323) 533-4416 Study: Industry Sues EPA More Often Than Environ...

Why Won't Clean Tech Community Stand Up Against Keystone Pipeline? #TarSandsAction #noKXL #energy

Why Won't Clean Tech Community Stand Up Against...

treehugger.com 31 Aug '11, 12pm

That's the big question emanating from many in the activist community. A recent press release from 350.org argues forceful...

GOP’s dirty air hit list sacrifices Americans’ health

GOP’s dirty air hit list sacrifices Americans’ ...

grist.org 01 Sep '11, 7pm

The bill also establishes a new requirement that a panel of cabinet members with no environmental expertise review these a...